by tony pearce » Fri May 14, 2010 12:57 pm
Ben/Amanda, Thanks for recent emails and the forum postings. My intent was to post a response from a Westonbirt Education Volunteer, that demonstarted that I did not share the level of enthusiasum for the drawings as expressed by one member of FC staff.
I accept that the drawings show a facility that would be a significant improvement and satisfy the high level accommodation requirements and facilities. Having been requested to comment in the past on the current facilities and the original plans for the Keepers Cottage/Kennels proposals, I have carried on with the current proposals. The launch of the Project has my support, and it is expected that the development of a totally new facility would enable us to achieve the high level specification requirements.
The feedback supplied indicates that my concern is that the orientation of the building/accommodation and the location of facilities within the building do not make effective use of the footprint/area. We have agreed to disagree on the details.
I suspect that some of the requirements have been compromised due to projected costings being excessive, details of which have only been discussed at Project Meetings. There has also evidence that it is too late to consider any change to the DRAFT PLANNING PROPOSAL, which is disappointing.
The reference to consultation with team members includes the Volunteers, some of whom have expreesed similar concerns, but as yet they may not have felt it worth responding.
As usual there is the requirement for compromise, but I hope that it does not result in significant expenditure in the next 15years, in order to demonstrate achieving the overal Project Objectives.
I would also point out that we have not seen the Project Landscape Proposals or the plans for Keepers Cottage and the Kennels, ( Are the Cottage and Kennels part of the Project Plans ???)
With reference to other project designs that the architects have been involved with, the Savill Building is vast and as you suggest inappropriate for Westonbirt site. What others timber buildings they designed and have been built is still an outstanding question. In addition the construction timescales were way outside the Westonbirt expectations? What have they achieved in the form of timber buildings since 2006?
The Forum Feedback/Postings are limited at this time, and dissappointing that while other Volunteers have voiced concerns to me and at meetings, they have not forwarded those concerns in writing. I hope that the presentations planned for the Volunteers in early June will give you a formal feedback which you will also be able to respond.